The risks of reaching for yield

You are receiving this email as a subscriber to MoneyWeek Asia.
If you have not already done so, please click here to confirm your subscription.

Unsubscribe. To stop receiving MoneyWeek Asia emails, please click here.

23 September, 2011 The risks of reaching for yield An Indonesian stock going cheap From Cris Sholto Heaton, in London Dear Golden Jann, Sometimes we make the right investment calls for the wrong reasons. A couple of years ago, I suggested that Asian local currency government debt looked attractive. And that view played out even better than I hoped. Had you bought the ABF Pan Asia Bond Index Fund, a broad-based Hong Kong-listed ETF, at the start of 2010, you would have made 30-35% including dividends and currency appreciation. Returns on higher-yielding debt from some individual countries have been two-three times that. Those are pretty decent returns from bonds. Too decent in fact. For quite a while, I’ve been warning that emerging market debt had run ahead of the fundamentals. And in the last few days, a big sell-off in Indonesia has demonstrated that only too well… ADVERTISEMENT A MoneyWeek exclusive from income specialist Stephen Bland… "You really don't need to worry which way the market goes"… Here's a PROVEN way to make money whether it goes up, down or sideways! Watch Stephen's presentation here. Forecasts are not a reliable indicator of future results. Your capital is at risk when you invest in shares, never risk more than you can afford to lose. Please seek independent financial advice if necessary. MoneyWeek Ltd. Customer Services: 0207 633 3780. Foreign investors are driving this market I originally had several arguments in favour of emerging market (EM) debt. One was that over time emerging markets would get to grips with inflation, while the West would see higher inflation due to loose monetary policy. This would be a reversal of the traditional pattern and lead to a lower inflation premium in EMs. This definitely hasn’t worked out. Inflation may be high in some developed countries such as the UK, but it remains high in most EMs as well. But that’s not a huge problem. This was a longer-term argument and I still think it’s very likely that the West is heading for an inflation problem in the years ahead, while EMs can avoid it if they take the right action. Another assumption I made was that EM local currency debt markets would become deeper and more liquid as a result of a bigger pool of local institutions and other investors. This hasn’t worked out either – and that’s more worrying. Take a look at the chart below from UBS. This shows the inflows of foreign money and the percentage of debt held by foreign investors for six popular markets (Indonesia, Korea, Malaysia, Mexico, Poland and Turkey). As you can see, foreign holdings are at record highs. So what’s the problem with this? It looks, surely, like local currency debt is becoming more of an international asset class. And isn’t that what we want? Well, no. Foreign money is often hot money – it can flow in and out on a whim. It’s good to see assets being held more widely. But we also want to see the growth of local institutional investors, who act as a stabilising influence on the market. That is happening slowly in many countries. But it’s foreign flows that have driven the boom. Even worse, those foreign flows may be a relatively shallow pool. There are relatively few major EM local currency debt investors and individual institutions that can hold a relatively large percentage of a given country’s debt. If one institution needs to sell in large amounts, it can have a serious impact on some markets. Emerging market debt is not a safe haven The third reason I liked EM debt was that many emerging markets would be recognised as better quality credits than they were before. They would then trade on lower yields, boosting bond prices. Superficially, this has happened. We’ve heard a lot of talk about how EMs are better placed these days. I often say it myself. But I don’t think that is what’s been driving the market. It probably accounted for many of the gains before the crisis, when EM debt was a lower profile but strongly performing asset. Today, it feels more like this is a justification for the real reason that ever more investors have been buying into these bonds. That brings us to the fourth and final bullish factor for EM debt. Foreign investors were going to buy it for the yield. With US, UK and good quality Euro debt yielding 2.5-3.5% on ten-year government bonds, the 10% available on Indonesia was going to look pretty attractive. And that’s exactly what has happened. Investors have rushed into EM debt on the basis of higher yields plus currency appreciation. There’s nothing wrong with this as one part of the investment case. But it’s worrying if blindly groping for yield is the main driver behind the EM debt bull market. And it’s doubly worrying if investors deny that this is what they are doing by instead using higher quality and better liquidity as their cover story. Unfortunately, that appears to be what’s happening. About a month ago, I was at an EM panel discussion featuring three experienced fund managers. Two were in EM equity and I found them surprisingly cautious and balanced given where they worked. The third was at one of the major investors in EM debt. His presentation was interesting but glib, skating over risks and making a number of overblown claims about liquidity, market size and quality. At no point did he admit the obvious: the money coming into his firm was thinking about yield first and foremost. And you can hear this a lot. The latest meme has it that EMs are the new safe haven – safer than the US. This is blatantly not true. I believe EM prospects are better than the West and they will make a better long-term investment (although the Euro panic is starting to throw up attractive opportunities there and good quality companies are fairly priced in the US). But this is not the same thing as being a safe haven. Indeed, almost by definition a true safe haven is a rotten investment. It’s where people rush when they are fearful and the return of capital completely dominates the return on capital. That’s why short-term US bonds have on occasion had a negative yield in the last few years. Investors can be willing to accept a guaranteed loss of 0.1% to be sure of nothing worse. ADVERTISEMENT Four Crucial Money Moves You Can Make NOW… Before Britain heads back to the nightmare 1970s! Watch your free, urgent report today! It's HERE. The Fleet Street Letter is a regulated product issued by MoneyWeek Ltd. Your capital is at risk when you invest in shares, never risk more than you can afford to lose. Please seek independent financial advice if necessary. 0207 633 3780. Buy equity or FX instead That clearly does not describe EMs. And hence lately we have seen a rush back to the US and an unwinding of some of those supposedly safe yet high-yielding EM positions. Indonesian ten-year bonds have seen yields shoot from about 6.5% to about 7.5% in a matter of days. There’s been similar action in longer-dated Brazilian bonds. Obviously, this is not the end of the world. We’ve seen shake outs like this before. Even if we ignore the frantic selling during the global crisis, the Indonesian ten-year bond moved a similar amount at the start of 2011. But this should disabuse investors of the idea that the world has yet turned on its head. There is a fair chance that at some point the US dollar will be a junk currency if America continues to follow its current policies. But we’re not there yet. It is still proving to be the safe haven when fear gets too high. EM investors need to recognise that they are taking on risk in the hope of reward and not delude themselves with talk about safe havens. They need to expect volatility – and if they can’t ride it out, they probably shouldn’t be in these assets. And at these levels, I don’t think the risk/reward ratio is right in the longer-dated EM debt that investors have rushed into. If you’re taking risk, you might as well be in equity. Sentiment has been pretty upbeat on Indonesia for a while and now that it’s souring, stocks are taking a hit as well as debt. The Jakarta Composite is off 15% since early September (see chart below). It’s now on a price/earnings ratio of about 13-14 times. I’m not convinced it’s as cheap as that looks because margins are probably approaching a cyclical high. It looks more expensive on a price/book basis relative to history, as discussed last week: The cheapest markets in Asia. And investors need to be mindful about the effect that cheap debt can have on equities. Firms grow used to being able to borrow at lower rates, gear up and then find themselves in trouble when that’s no longer possible. But Indonesian shares certainly look more attractive than Indonesian government bonds if bought through funds that focus on well-run companies (the US-listed Aberdeen Indonesia Fund (US:IF) is one possibility). And readers with the ability to invest directly in Indonesia could certainly find specific companies to buy after the recent sell-off. For example, pharmaceutical, healthcare and nutrition firm Kalbe Farma (KLBF:IJ) is down almost 25%. This is a good-quality business with minimal debt, mid-twenties return on equity and a 2.5% dividend yield. It may not look cheap on a p/e of around 19, but this is exactly the sort of branded consumer goods business that can earn excess returns over a long period of time and is worth paying a premium for. Alternatively, there is still a good investment case for many EM currencies. If policymakers are going to keep inflation under control, they will need to let these appreciate over time. Ideally, you could do this by opening foreign currency accounts. But for a basket approach, you could look at a bond fund that is as near to cash as possible, such as the Aberdeen Global Asian Local Currency Short Duration Bond Fund. This might not be completely immune to wobbles in the bond market. But it holds shorter maturity and more liquid bonds and consequently should be much less affected by liquidity and inflation issues. The FX theme doesn’t have the same potential returns that shares do. But the risk/reward payout is more balanced than with longer-dated bonds. Meanwhile, holding cash in the same currencies in which you intend to invest means that you are in position to deploy it into the stock market during sell-offs in the hope of good returns on the rebound. This kind of flexibility is where investment safety comes from. Not long-term bonds at record low interest rates and few locals ready to step in when you want to sell in a hurry. That’s a big risk to take for just a bit more yield than you’d get at home. Got a comment on this article? Leave a comment on the MoneyWeek website, here. Until next week, Cris Sholto Heaton (MoneyWeekAsia@moneyweek.com) MoneyWeek Asia MONEYWEEK ASIA is the free weekly email service brought to you by MoneyWeek. For a 3-week FREE trial of the MoneyWeek magazine & website, click here now: Sign up for a 3-week FREE trial of MoneyWeek Or if you prefer to place your order over the phone, just call 0207 633 3780 and one of our Customer Service representatives will take your order for you. Know someone who'd like to receive the MoneyWeek Asia email themselves? Simply forward the following link to anyone you think could benefit from our weekly service: Sign up to the Free MoneyWeek Asia email here © 2011 MoneyWeek Ltd. All Rights Reserved. The content of this email may not be reproduced without the written consent of MoneyWeek Ltd. Registered Office: Sea Containers House, 7th Floor, 20 Upper Ground, London, SE1 9JD. Registered in England No. 04016750. VAT No. GB 629 7287 94. MoneyWeek is a registered trade mark owned by MoneyWeek Limited. Past performance and forecasts are not reliable indicators of future performance. Shares are by their nature are speculative and can be volatile and you should never invest more than you can safely afford to lose. Information in MoneyWeek Asia is for general information only and is not intended to be relied upon by individual readers in making (or not making) specific investment decisions. Appropriate independent advice should be obtained before making any such decision. MoneyWeek Asia is an unregulated product published by MoneyWeek Ltd. MoneyWeek is authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority. http://www.fsa.gov.uk/register/home.do FSA number: 509798. True Value is a regulated products issued by MoneyWeek Ltd Query? If you want to email us with a query, simply reply to this email and our Customer Services team will deal with your request. Alternatively, you can contact us by telephone on 020 7633 3780, Monday to Friday, 9.00am - 5.30pm (Wednesday, 9.00am - 2.00pm only). If a link doesn't work... Please note: if you use a web based email service such as Hotmail, you may need to copy and paste hyperlinks into your browser's address bar for them to work properly. Email address change? Please contact our customer services team on 0207 633 3780 or email cs@moneyweek.com to change your details. Our customer services team is available Monday to Friday 9.00am - 5.30pm (Wednesday 9.00am - 2.00pm only). Syndication If you'd like to put MoneyWeek Asia articles on your website, for free, please email - syndication@moneyweek.com. IMPORTANT We do require that: 1. You ask permission first, 2. That you do not use our articles until we have confirmed that you can, and 3. That you clearly attribute any article you use to us, and paste a link back to www.moneyweek.com . Make sure you get MoneyWeek Asia every week... Unsolicited, unwanted advertising e-mail, commonly known as "spam", has become a big problem. Most email services and internet service providers have put blocking or filtering systems in place, or created 'blacklists', in order to protect users. Unfortunately, this may mean that emails you have requested - such as MoneyWeek Asia - are sent to your 'spam' or 'bulk email' folder, or are blocked entirely. To ensure you get MoneyWeek Asia to your inbox every week, please follow our whitelisting instructions . To change your details, please contact our customer services team on 0207 633 3780 or email cs@moneyweek.com To unsubscribe please click here